The following table contains some statistics about digital communication busses that I have recently seen in designs, notably the bus length to bit period statistic that I have talked about in the past (the higher the bus length to bit period ratio, the more complex the design of the bus is).
| Example 1 | Example 2 | Example 3 | |
| Communication Standard | DDR 2 SDRAM | PCI-Express Cable Interface | DDR 2 SDRAM |
| Signaling Type | 1.8 V SSTL | Differential CML | 1.8 V SSTL |
| Communication Architecture | Hybrid Source Synchronous | Serial | Hybrid Source Synchronous |
| Bus Delay (ns) | 0.34 | 14.21 | 0.7 |
| Signaling Rate (Mbps) | 400 | 2500 | 533.33 |
| Data Rate (Mbps) | 400 | 2000 | 533.33 |
| Bit Error Rate | NA | 1.0 e-12 | NA |
| Ratio of bus length to bit period | 0.14 | 28.42 | 0.37 |
| Ratio of rise time to signaling bit period | 0.042 | 0.125 | 0.213 |
| Design Difficulty | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Comments | Single SDRAM chip on board | Single DIMM (rank 1) on board - very narrow design space |
The design difficulty ratings are described as follows:
1 - very easy (no routing rules needed, just hook it up)
2 - easy (limited routing rules based on rules of thumb and app notes)
3 - average (routing rules needed based on rules of thumb, app notes, or SI simulation)
4 - difficult (routing rules developed with extensive SI simulation and modeling)
5 - very difficult (routing rules developed with extensive SI simulation and modeling, plus a very narrow solution space or a lot of difficulty getting it to work)
I have noticed a couple of things about DDR 2 SDRAM in the last couple of design examples I've worked on.